what movie won the 1950 academy award for visual effects

However, if you’ve ever pondered how The ChubbChubbs! could possibly win an award for best-anything, much less an Oscar, I think this is as close as you’ll ever get to an answer. In fairness, a seven-person survey, even over two years, is still a tiny sample size for any kind of definitive argument for or against Academy members. Some members even acknowledge that they didn’t view all the films, yet still voted in the animation categories.

Like last year’s survey, few of this year’s participants appear to apply any kind of objective criteria to judging the animation categories.

It’s not that the Academy members have a poor rationale for their choices it’s that they often have no rationale at all for their choices. And when it comes to animation, the series might be more aptly titled Brutally Ignorant Oscar Ballots.įor the second year in a row, Scott Feinberg of the Reporter surveyed seven Academy members about who they voted for, and their selections for the animation and vfx categories are beyond comprehension. Whereas the animation community once had to share anecdotal stories about apathetic Academy members, now the membership’s handiwork is on full display thanks to the Hollywood Reporter’s “Brutally Honest Oscar Ballot” series. This is not some bizarro awards universe it’s the world of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences, an organization whose general membership is aggressively indifferent towards animation yet hands out three annual animation-related Oscars. SEE ALSO: Definitive Proof That Academy Voters Are Ignorant About Animation In this world, a voter would give a visual effects award to a film not because the film’s vfx met a certain standard of achievement, but “just to kind of recognize it.”

What movie won the 1950 academy award for visual effects